0

Melton: Who, Me?

"I don't know anything about that. I can't imagine what I've done," Melton said.

The Jackson rumor mill is on overdrive today about federal indictments of Mayor Frank Melton coming down in the wake of an FBI investigation that pulled several members of his administration before a federal grand jury last week. But the feds ain't talking, as they tend not to do in such cases. Until they're ready, anyway. As for Melton, he told the JFP's Adam Lynch at City Hall this afternoon that he hasn't heard a thing about a possible federal investigation of him.

Read more at the JFP's Melton Blog/Archive.

Previous Comments

ID
96299
Comment

“I don’t know anything about that. I can’t imagine what I’ve done," Melton said. HUH?

Author
LatashaWillis
Date
2007-10-15T17:07:12-06:00
ID
96300
Comment

Melton, that's the problem. YOU'VE DONE NOTHING (for the city).

Author
LawClerk
Date
2007-10-15T18:56:21-06:00
ID
96301
Comment

The Melton administration has been a first class case of Who Me? for Jackson!

Author
pikersam
Date
2007-10-15T20:45:46-06:00
ID
96302
Comment

Did you see the WAPT 10pm where they interviewed Melton, and he was real clear in saying that he never had any "intent" to harm anyone or anything. He said "intent" several times. Guess he thinks that since they could not prove "intent" in his other criminal trial that he can get away with anything so long as he does the crime without "intent".

Author
malt
Date
2007-10-15T21:19:45-06:00
ID
96303
Comment

We saw the same thing on WLBT. It sounds like an attorney talked to him after his quote to Adam, and he's giving a more careful, canned answer now. I'm guessing that a federal judge won't be as pliable as jolly Judge Webster when it comes to being convinced to demand that the prosecution show "evil intent."

Author
DonnaLadd
Date
2007-10-15T21:50:52-06:00
ID
96304
Comment

Pike, that was a really FUNKY link you posted. LOL

Author
LatashaWillis
Date
2007-10-15T22:17:33-06:00
ID
96305
Comment

Ray, correct me if I am wrong but if the proof of possible alcohol impairment was allowed then they would not have had to prove intent.

Author
malt
Date
2007-10-16T05:29:19-06:00
ID
96306
Comment

Pikersam, you always come up with a winner. That "Who Me" link fits the scanerio, perfectly. I'm reminded of the kiddie game called, "Who Stole the Cookie From the Cookie Jar?" It ends with, ....Yes, YOU STOLE the Cookie From the Cookie Jar. LOL. This is such a puzzle and my only hope is that enough of the pieces fit to give those who continue to think that frank is good for our City, a serious WAKE UP call.

Author
justjess
Date
2007-10-16T08:57:55-06:00
ID
96307
Comment

Where's Dale Danks? Where's Sarah O'Reilly? Where's Stephanie Parker Weaver? Where's Higginbotham? Where's Tyrone Lewis? All of these clowns are mighty quiet. Just kinda makes you wonder ummmmmmmmmmmmmm!

Author
maad
Date
2007-10-16T09:14:30-06:00
ID
96308
Comment

maad, I don't know where these "clowns" are but, let me take a shot at gussing: Danks is somewhere trying to figure out how, when and where he will get his money for representing frank. He's singin the well know rap, "The Witch (B) BETTA have my MONEY. Sarah O'Reilly is at the law library trying to figure out legal strategies to avoid being disbarred. Her theme song is: "Ain't Too Proud To Beg." Stephanie Parker Weaver is trying to find an office, a closet, a seat - anything/anywhere: Her theme sone is: "I SHALL NOT BE MOVED" Higginbotham is singing: "Just Walking In The Rain." Tyrone Lewis is humming "Amazing Grace and bellows out loud and clear the last line: ....."Was BLIND BUT, NOW I SEE!"

Author
justjess
Date
2007-10-16T09:59:42-06:00
ID
96309
Comment

justjess, your last post was so on point! ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!

Author
blkokc
Date
2007-10-16T14:01:53-06:00
ID
96310
Comment

U 2 funny justjess! LOL!

Author
pikersam
Date
2007-10-16T14:19:11-06:00
ID
96311
Comment

lol, justjess! You hit the nail right on the head (or is that the house of cards in exactly the right spot with a sledgehammer?). ....'was blind but now I see'....and so do a lot of Jacksonians who voted for FM - finally!

Author
lucdix
Date
2007-10-16T16:16:34-06:00
ID
96312
Comment

its amazing how popular this guy still is..and how many people still hold him in such high regards.....amazing at best!

Author
blkokc
Date
2007-10-16T17:39:48-06:00
ID
96313
Comment

Well, there is an argument that he is the same guy he's always been. He's certainly the same man I met during his campaign and that I saw on those videotapes of the old Bottom Lines. No different. This area has a huge gullibility problem, unfortunately. It's hard to understand it, really.

Author
DonnaLadd
Date
2007-10-16T17:44:43-06:00
ID
96314
Comment

I have lived in Jackson in the past, approximately 10 years or so. I visit there often. Many!!!!! friends still there. I ran into another former Jacksonian today. She said she was scared to death to be in Jackson any more , due to the crime rate. My response to her " I am not scared of anything" All I can say is that "Thank God McMillin is the Chief Law Enforcement Officer in the county". I am calling his office if I ever need help.

Author
JMK
Date
2007-10-16T19:35:27-06:00
ID
96315
Comment

The scare tactics, all these people is fooled jackson is not that bad ive lived here 24 years since i was born iam not dead and scared, i call it capitalism at its best, if the news stations and newspapers can beat that drum from dust to dawn that crime is out of control and nowhere in jackson is safe, we lose citizens and biuseness and who benefits, the suburbs. How will jackson ever be a world class city when bigotry and race baiting and scare tactics.

Author
NewJackson
Date
2007-10-16T19:44:19-06:00
ID
96316
Comment

Ladd: This area has a huge gullibility problem, unfortunately. It's hard to understand it, really. NewJackson: if the news stations and newspapers can beat that drum from dust to dawn that crime is out of control and nowhere in jackson is safe, we lose citizens and biuseness and who benefits, the suburbs. Philip: I'd say the problem is that too many voters are much more impressed by image than substance. Too many people think substance is B-O-R-I-N-G and such a K-I-L-L-J-O-Y -- two thing that really tend to turn so many voters off. You all have herd the cliche that politicians are marketed like soap. We'll, this is yet another example of it. Worse yet, i think its a deeper cultural problem because it goes far beyond politics. Think of corporate managers who focus on kissing upper managements ass over measurable results. Heck, think of how many in society choose their own friends at work, at church, an at their clubs and hangouts based on colorful exciting superficiality! Do I even have to mention our lovers - and even spouses? (no offense to divorcees, but I think this may explain the root cause society's many divorces). This kind of situation is EXACTLY what you get charisma over competence and responsive government! If so many adults would stop act like they're freaking 12 year olds, then that would work wonders for our world!!

Author
Philip
Date
2007-10-16T23:19:54-06:00
ID
96317
Comment

malt:"...he never had any "intent" to harm anyone or anything. He said "intent" several times." So, does that if I killed someone in a car wreck because I drove south in 55's north-bound lane, then I don't deserve jail time because i didn't INTEND to kill anyone..but merely to satisfy a "Devil made me do it" urge? Just curious

Author
Philip
Date
2007-10-16T23:33:55-06:00
ID
96318
Comment

Phillip:"So, does that if I killed someone in a car wreck because I drove south in 55's north-bound lane, then I don't deserve jail time because i didn't INTEND to kill anyone..but merely to satisfy a "Devil made me do it" urge? Just curious" No. Intent can be inferred. Not *everything* needs to have an intent element. In fact, the Mayor would do well to remember his misdemeanor gun nolo contendere pleas. There was no intent needed in that trial. He carried the guns, and he was guilty. No intent needed to "carry in a church, park, or school."

Author
LawClerk
Date
2007-10-17T05:27:09-06:00

Comments

Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.

Sign in to comment