0

Are Violent-Crime 'Strike Forces' Worth It?

A proposal to create a system of violent-crime strike forces around the state passed a Senate committee on Thursday.

A proposal to create a system of violent-crime strike forces around the state passed a Senate committee on Thursday.

One of the keystones of Gov. Phil Bryant's legislative agenda passed a hurdle as Judiciary B Committee of the Mississippi State Senate approved a bill to create a system of statewide violent-crime strike forces.

Bryant, who has made public safety his top legislative priority this year, first announced the plan in his executive budget recommendation in December.

The House Judiciary B Committee passed its version of the strike-force bill, which committee Chairman Rep. Mark Baker, R-Brandon, sponsored on Jan. 29. Their Senate counterparts followed on Thursday, but not without several lawmakers raising a few pointed questions.

"Why is this even needed?" Sen. Derrick Simmons, D-Greenville, asked of SB 2774.

Simmons pointed out that multi-jurisdictional task forces consisting of local, state and federal officials are common, and he wondered why another expensive layer of law enforcement is necessary.

Bryant has said the strike forces would assist local and state law enforcement officials by deploying to high-crime and gang areas. The plan involves spending $1.5 million per year for three teams, broken up into northern, central and southern districts, which would operate under the supervision of the state attorney general. Each district would also have a commander, appointed by Bryant and Attorney General Jim Hood, a Democrat.

The teams would have 12 to 15 members each; no member could earn more than $15,000 in overtime pay per year, the legislation states.

Sen. Brice Wiggins, R-Pascagoula, had a similar concern about adding another layer of law enforcement. Wiggins offered an amendment so that the strike force could also benefit from seizures. Currently, seizures of cash and property purchased with cash made illegally represent a valuable revenue stream for law enforcement organizations.

Wiggins' amendment was successful, and the bill passed by unanimous voice vote out of committee.

Comments

NotLikeU 10 years, 2 months ago

Mississippi developing strike forces? What branch would this team be under? The local SWATs are not enough? However, the state does not seem to have the crime levels needed for this level of law enforcement, yearly. It seems like there is a greater agenda unfolding.

0

Scott1962 10 years, 2 months ago

So what are the police departments etc for? Non violent crimes? This is a prime example of nothing. I would have thought having "In God We Trust" printed on all of our confederate money would have been more than enough to protect us from those evil 14 year olds in high poverty areas. If Phil could think of a way to get a picture of himself standing beside an AK-47 wielding Jesus I honestly believe his life would be complete. What a fking idiot

0

elizabethwaibel 10 years, 1 month ago

Any way to get records of the calls existing metro-area SWAT teams responded to over, say, the past year? For example, what on earth is Clinton using a SWAT team for? I've wondered about that for a long time.

1

Sign in to comment