Ellington

In 2006, the CEO of Exxon Mobil exclaimed that, gosh, his corporation was rolling in so much profit that he simply didn't know how to spend it all.

Well, one place worthy of major investment would have been research and development on alternative fuels to help America break its dependency on ever-more expensive and ever-more polluting oil. But, no go. Two years later, with oil above $100 a barrel and Exxon's profits topping $40 billion a year, the rationale for such an investment is even stronger. Yet, the oil giant recently rejected a congressional request that it start putting 10 percent of its earnings into alternative energy-development.

OK, maybe we don't even want Big Oil mucking around in solar, wind, hydrogen and other renewables, since they would try to monopolize production and engage in the same kind of gouging they do with oil products. But here's one small step Congress could take toward new energy resources: Repeal the $1.8 billion annual tax subsidy that the Bushites gave to the oil industry in the 2004 tax bill. Instead of continuing to put this freebie in the pockets of the Exxons, let's invest these tax dollars in a renewable energy future—$1.8 billion would roughly double what Washington now spends for R & D on alternative sources.

Besides, with $100-a-barrel oil and the top five corporations banking $123 billion in yearly profits, why are we taxpayers subsidizing them? We already pay a king's ransom at the pump, so let's cut off this tax giveaway they never should have gotten in the first place. But you can never overestimate oil company greed. Industry executives and lobbyists are now whining to Congress that, since oil prices might come down someday, they should be able to keep this subsidy as a cushion.

Hey, build your own cushion the old-fashioned way—with your rip-off profits.

Jim Hightower is a national radio commentator, writer, public speaker and author of "Thieves In High Places: They've Stolen Our Country And It's Time to Take It Back." He says he has taken on the role of battling the Powers That Be on behalf of the Powers That Ought To Be—consumers, working families, environmentalists, small businesses and just plain folks.

Previous Comments

ID

119830

Comment

Oil companies do not need subsidies to find or market oil. George W. Bush is not an oil man--he managed to drill more dry holes in Texas than even unlucky people! We need an Institute for Alternative Fuels for research purposes that could assist, funnel grant money, gather suggestions, etc. (act as point-man) for the nation. Maybe even a Manhattan Project--we need policies (national, state, local), manufacturing, etc.

Author

Turtleread

Date

2008-05-07T18:02:19-06:00

ID

119832

Comment

The columnist makes a lot of sense. The Government could try leveling the playing field by getting rid of subsidies to oil companies and and investing that money in alternative fuel sources. It's not like the oil companies are hurting for that money. Then we would see how competitive and viable some of the alternatives are.

Author

Jeff Lucas

Date

2008-05-07T20:39:23-06:00